
IMF
Assessing stabilisation and structural reform in a post-Communist world (Russia 1995)
IMF
In the modern day, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) is undeniably a contentious institute, having developed an infamous reputation for interventions that have often been tied to eventually worsening the economic situation of the nations it sought to help.
In Latin America, the economic issues and prevalence of IMF intervention, has meant the institute has turned into a natural enemy and focus for protesting Western interference. However its unique role in being the sole global body to provide loans aimed at nations on the brink of (or in) financial crisis, has given it the title of “the lender of last resort” and ensured relevancy throughout time as nations are often left with no other option apart from bilateral agreements.
​
The IMF’s modern-day mission statement is "working to foster global monetary cooperation, secure financial stability, facilitate international trade, promote high employment and sustainable economic growth, and reduce poverty around the world”. Working with 190 member states as a forum for ensuring the global economy is protected and prosperous.
However, the IMF’s unpopularity relates to the conditionality of lending, as these tend to involve structural adjustment involving privatisation, deregulation and additional bureaucracy rail guards. Fundamentally the failures of the IMF are widely publicised in comparison to their successes, and the rigid structure in which the IMF provides support is an easy target for discontent.
THE DAIS



